If you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|maxim|[[File:wrongroom.png|450px|center|Thumb|It’s not you. It’s me.]]}}We are indebted to Marissa Mayer for this golden nugget of wisdom: {{shitmaxim|If you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room}}
{{a|maxim|[[File:wrongroom.png|450px|center|Thumb|It’s not you. It’s me.]]}}We are indebted to Marissa Mayer for this golden nugget of wisdom:  


At first blush it seems rather appealing. Only when you reflect on the downward spiral into oblivion it incites, does its true horror becomes plain. If — as it may, for it does explain a few things — this reveals a true fact about the world, it is a distressing one. No one emerges with much hope, or credit:
{{shitmaxim|If you’re the smartest person in the room, you’re in the wrong room}}.


Firstly, and obviously, it is quite bad news for clever people, who must as a result continually absent themselves from rooms they were probably enjoying being in. But it is hardly better for the great, face-slapping mediocrity, for it will make our lives harder too. Is it any wonder that we are all so confused?  ''At least'' one person in every room is in the wrong place.  
At first blush it seems rather appealing. Only when you reflect on the downward spiral it incites does its counsel of oblivion become plain. For if — as it may, for it explains a few things — [[Mayer’s Law]] reveals a true fact about the world, it is a distressing one for a few groups. ''At least'' one person in every room is in the wrong place. ''At least''; most likely it is more: Nobel laureates have no monopoly on room dysphoria. To the contrary, the stupider we are, the more likely we are to be in the wrong room.


''At least''; most likely it is more: Nobel laureates have no monopoly on room dysphoria. To the contrary, the stupider you are, the more likely you are to be in the wrong room.
'''Clever people''': Firstly, and obviously, it is bad news for brain-boxes, who must now continually absent themselves from rooms they probably quite enjoy being in.  


This news will also be disappointing for teachers, implying as it does that ''they are all constantly  in the wrong room'': either by being ''too'' smart — per [[Mayer’s Law]] — or not being smart ''enough'', it being a founding proposition that one should not educate people who are already cleverer than you are.  
'''Stupid people''': It is hardly better we of the great, face-slapping mediocrity, whose lives will become harder too, dealing with this insidious brain drain whenever two or three are gathered together.


It also means lavatory cubicles are just wrong, on principle.<ref>There may be an exception for those high tech self-flushing ones you find in Japan, for uncommonly dull people.</ref>
'''Teachers''': This news will also be disappointing for teachers, implying as it does that ''none'' of them are where they should be: they disqualify themselves from their surroundings either by being ''too'' smart — per [[Mayer’s Law]] — or not being smart ''enough'', it being a founding proposition that you should not educate people who are already cleverer than you are.


I have just had an argument with my daughter about who should leave the kitchen. Eventually we agreed she should go. But, dilemma! The minute she left ''I'' became the smartest person in the kitchen, so I had to leave too. I joined her in the laundry.
'''Lavatories''': It also means lavatory cubicles are just wrong, on principle.<ref>There may be an exception for those high tech self-flushing ones you find in Japan, for uncommonly dull people.</ref>


“WHAT ARE YOU DOING, DAD?" she is yelling at me. "Now I have to leave the laundry, too."
'''O! [[Paradox]]''': It gets worse. The plain implication is that ''no'' room has a stable equilibrium and occupancy tends to zero. For example, I have just had an argument with my daughter about who should leave the kitchen. Eventually we agreed she should go. But, dilemma! The minute she left ''I'' became the smartest person in the kitchen, so I had to leave too.  


Firstly, being the stupider one I don’t see how I was meant to know this? Secondly, I don't think she was allowed in there by herself in the first place, but her presence at least gave ''me'' some cover.
I joined her in the laundry.


But as soon as she left I had to leave as well.
“WHAT ARE YOU DOING, DAD?" she is yelling at me. “Now I have to leave the laundry, too.


Just when this was getting really annoying for both of us, traipsing around the house, going in and out of all the rooms, we worked out what to do. (It was my daughter’s idea: she’s the smart one.)
Being the stupider one, I don’t see how I was meant to know this? Plus, I don't think she should have gone in there by herself in the first place, but her presence at least gave ''me'' some cover. But as soon as she left I had to leave as well.


Finally, we can sit down. As luck would have it, it is quite a mild evening for December, though it looks like it might rain.
Just when this was getting really annoying for both of us, traipsing around the house, going in and out of all the rooms, we worked out what to do. (It was my daughter’s idea: she’s the smart one.) Finally, we can sit down. As luck would have it, it is quite a mild evening for December, though it looks like it might rain.


But I need the loo.
Not sure what we will do when someone needs the loo.


{{Sa}}
{{Sa}}
*[[Paradox]]{{c|paradox}}
*[[Paradox]]{{c|paradox}}
{{Ref}}
{{Ref}}
<references />{{C|Paradox}}

Navigation menu