Lindy effect: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
===Blockchains as a case study===
===Blockchains as a case study===
There are different levels and which ideas operate.<ref>A sound idea might be articulated in a fashionable way, and so become unfashionable, while at a deeper [[Pace layering|layer]] the idea is still sound. One can render a twelve bar turnaround in a modish new romantic way which goes out of fashion, while the basic song remains sound. This idea propels Scott Bradlee’s ''Postmodern Jukebox''.</ref>
There are different levels and which ideas operate.<ref>A sound idea might be articulated in a fashionable way, and so become unfashionable, while at a deeper [[Pace layering|layer]] the idea is still sound. One can render a twelve bar turnaround in a modish new romantic way which goes out of fashion, while the basic song remains sound. This idea propels Scott Bradlee’s ''Postmodern Jukebox''.</ref>
</ref> At the time of writing, a permissionless [[blockchain]] is a novel solution to the problem of definitively recording ownership and registering transfer of goods. It is yet to be fully tested in lots of different operating conditions, so we do not as yet know how robust it is. But “a means of recording and registering title to movable assets” is not a new idea — title registries have been around since at least William of Normandy commissioned the Domesday Book, a thousand year ago. We have all manner of ownership registries for shares and financial assets, land, ships, planes, corporations, intellectual property — there will be some kind of title registry for any asset valuable enough to be worth protecting. Just as blockchain is an instance of the abstract form “ownership registry”, an ownership registry is just an instance of the abstract form “database”.
 
At the time of writing, a [[permissionless blockchain]] is a novel solution to the problem of definitively recording ownership and registering transfer of goods. It is yet to be fully tested in lots of different operating conditions, so we do not as yet know how robust it is. But “a means of recording and registering title to movable assets” is not a new idea — title registries have been around since at least William of Normandy commissioned the Domesday Book, a thousand year ago. We have all manner of ownership registries for shares and financial assets, land, ships, planes, corporations, intellectual property — there will be some kind of title registry for any asset valuable enough to be worth protecting. Just as blockchain is an instance of the abstract form “ownership registry”, an ownership registry is just an instance of the abstract form “database”.


So will [[permissionless blockchain]] sweep away all other forms of ownership registry?
So will [[permissionless blockchain]] sweep away all other forms of ownership registry?

Navigation menu