84,023
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You will notice similarities between the way a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way {{icds}} goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency. | [[(d)(i)(5) - Emissions Annex Provision|You]] will notice similarities between the way a {{euaprov|Suspension Event}} and a {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}}. One can, and we do, bellyache about the way {{icds}} goes about the task of rendering its fantastical ideas in the language of Shakespeare and Milton, but you can’t really fault them for consistency. | ||
Here, in counterpoint to a normal {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a {{euaprov|Cost of Carry Amount}}. | Here, in counterpoint to a normal {{euaprov|Settlement Disruption Event}} if there is delayed performance the payment obligation is adjusted to include a {{euaprov|Cost of Carry Amount}}. |