Netting manifesto: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
===But it’s a disaster===
===But it’s a disaster===
*'''No co-ordination''': The industry associations don’t co-ordinate their opinion gathering, and indeed treat the gathering opinions as some kind of secret, commercially vital operation.
*'''No co-ordination''': The industry associations don’t co-ordinate their opinion gathering, and indeed treat the gathering opinions as some kind of secret, commercially vital operation.
*'''Mucho duplication''': Despite ''tons'' of overlap in subject matter — whether an agreement is nettable for a given counterparty is unlikely to differ by agreement type — the [[industry association]]s instruct different firms, phrase their instructions differently, and identify and categorize counterparty types differently. B
*'''Mucho duplication''': Despite ''tons'' of overlap in subject matter — whether an agreement is nettable for a given counterparty is unlikely to differ by agreement type — the [[industry association]]s instruct different firms, phrase their instructions differently, and identify and categorize counterparty types differently.  
*'''Arbitrary gaps''': There are arbitrary caps in coverage. A significant portion of our counterparties are not covered by industry opinions and require bespoke opinions
*'''Arbitrary gaps''': There are arbitrary caps in coverage. A significant portion of our counterparties are not covered by industry opinions and require bespoke opinions
*'''Incomprehensible''': The opinons are long, verbose, and do not summarise of provide clear guidance, such that there are third-party services (e.g. AOSphere) designed to aid the interpretation and codification of opinions, and even these are inadequate, requiring additional internal interpretation.
*'''Incomprehensible''': The opinons are long, verbose, and do not summarise of provide clear guidance, such that there are third-party services (e.g. AOSphere) designed to aid the interpretation and codification of opinions, and even these are inadequate, requiring additional internal interpretation.

Navigation menu