The Infinite Game: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 7: Line 7:
Sinek manages also to misrepresent [[Adam Smith]], [[Shareholder capitalism]], [[Evolution by natural selection]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] and, most egregiously of all poor old Milton Friedman, whom Sinek paints as a kind of selfish Gorgon; something he emphatically was not.
Sinek manages also to misrepresent [[Adam Smith]], [[Shareholder capitalism]], [[Evolution by natural selection]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche]] and, most egregiously of all poor old Milton Friedman, whom Sinek paints as a kind of selfish Gorgon; something he emphatically was not.


Now Carse’s book is elegant but gnomic. It asks careful reading and, as you’d expect of an infinite game asks, the reader to work hard. But it rewards effort in a way that Sinek ’s superficial reading will not.
In fairness, Carse’s book, though elegant, is gnomic. It asks of its reader. It requires, but richly rewards, hard work. This seems to be work Sinek has not put in. His own book reads as if he’s read Carse’s flyleaf, thought, “okay, got it,” and taken off, embroidering the basic concept with his own


The greatest tragedy will be if Sinek Congress to wipe
The greatest tragedy will be if Sinek Congress to wipe

Navigation menu