83,229
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Now things start getting properly baroque. Whether one is Suspended or suffering a Settlement Disruption, the ’squad contemplates the scenario where the disruption stretches out so far past the original scheduled {{euaprov|Delivery Date}} that things have become ridiculous. | Now things start getting properly baroque. Whether one is Suspended or suffering a Settlement Disruption, the ’squad contemplates the scenario where the disruption stretches out so far past the original scheduled {{euaprov|Delivery Date}} that things have become ridiculous. | ||
After that amount of time, of course, we must deal with the phantoms and succubi of unexpected reconciliation deadlines, {{euaprov|End of Phase Reconciliation | After that amount of time, of course, we must deal with the phantoms and succubi of unexpected reconciliation deadlines, {{euaprov|End of Phase Reconciliation Deadline}}s and so on which, of course were hardly within the parties’ original contemplation, the original {{euaprov|Delivery Date}} having been deliberately scheduled to fall before any of these could happen. | ||
For a Settlement Disuption Event, at the end of an unseemly short period — it’s complex, but in any case not longer than nine {{euaprov|Delivery Business Days}} after the original {{euaprov|Delivery Date}} — an “{{isdaprov|Illegality}}” {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} will be deemed to occur. | For a Settlement Disuption Event, at the end of an unseemly short period — it’s complex, but in any case not longer than nine {{euaprov|Delivery Business Days}} after the original {{euaprov|Delivery Date}} — an “{{isdaprov|Illegality}}” {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} will be deemed to occur. |