Template:Emissions No Encumbrances comp: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The absence of [[encumbrance]]s — which, in the early days of the emissions trading world, where birth pangs still ricocheted and fraudulent waves lapped across the primordial carbon soup of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, was a matter of some concern — is covered fulsomely, and consistently, in all the emissions master trading documents. See:
The absence of [[encumbrance]]s — which was a matter of concern, in the early days of the emissions trading world, while birth pangs nascent fraud still ricocheted and lapped across the carbon soup of the primordial EU Emissions Trading Scheme — is covered fulsomely, consistently — if not a little defensively — in all the emissions master trading documents.  
 
See:
* “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}}
* “{{euaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (para {{euaprov|(d)(vii)}} in the {{emissionsannex}}
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things
*“{{ietaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{ietaprov|5.3}}) in the {{ietama}} and, of all things
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efetma}} Allowances Annex.
*“{{efetaprov|No Encumbrances}}” (cl {{efetaprov|6.3}}) in the {{efetma}} Allowances Annex.
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.
Here is a {{diff|77163|77164}} of ISDA vs IETA and, while you’re at it, {{diff|77164|77167}} IETA v EFET. Oh, go on, here is the {{diff|77163|77167}} of ISDA v EFET too. Don’t say I don’t spoil you.

Navigation menu