Template:Csa definitions and inconsistency summ: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Csa definitions and inconsistency summ (view source)

Revision as of 14:08, 31 August 2023

147 bytes added ,  31 August 2023
no edit summary
(Created page with "A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, throat-clearing, though marred by a bizarre for the avoidance of doubt rider which functions as both a ''non sequitur'' — no one was talking about transfers here, much less was in any particular state of confusion about them, so why bring it up now? — but also the classic self-hack: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider is calculated to do nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it. Wait: was I meant to...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, [[throat-clearing]], though marred by a bizarre [[for the avoidance of doubt]] rider which functions as both a ''[[non sequitur]]'' — no one was talking about transfers here, much less was in any particular state of confusion about them, so why bring it up now? — but also the classic self-hack: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider is [[calculated]] to do nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it. Wait: was I meant to be doubting something here? Should I have been confused? Have I missed something?  
A paragraph of unremarkable, if unnecessary, [[throat-clearing]], the “definitions and inconsistency” clauses are largely the same across all versions of the CSA.
 
==== “Transfer” ====
With one exception: the English law versions, but not the New York law ones,  are marred by a bizarre [[for the avoidance of doubt]] rider which is both a ''[[non sequitur]]'' — no one was talking about “transfers” here, much less was in any particular state of doubt about them — but also an own goal: rather than ''avoiding'' doubt, this rider does nothing quite so much as ''introduce'' it.  
 
Wait: was I ''meant'' to be doubting something here? Should I have been confused? Have I missed something?  


There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “[[delivery]]” of [[cash]] different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that I somehow missed, in Banking Law 302, in 1989?
There is nothing a [[Chicken Licken|cheerful attorney]] likes more than to worry about things, and she will toss sleeplessly for nights on end, fully occupied by questions such as — is “[[delivery]]” of [[cash]] different from “payment” of it? Is there something legally significant about “payment” that I somehow missed, in Banking Law 302, in 1989?
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/77754"

Navigation menu