84,181
edits
Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 8.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Template:M summ EFET Allowance Annex 8.1 (view source)
Revision as of 15:00, 8 September 2023
, 8 September 2023no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "An overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and ''The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits'' piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, they don’t. You might think buy in provisions...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and ''The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits'' piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, they don’t. You might think buy in provisions from a stock loan might have been a useful model for such a clause; so did I — but EFET’s {{cds}} didn’t and, unfortunately, ''they'' were the ones sitting in the padded cell trying to banish the very living idea of ''Bamboleo''. | [[Failure to Transfer - EFET Allowance Provision|An]] overview — written in the sparse text of someone who has been in solitary confinement with only an inexhaustible supply of biros, newsprint, and ''The Gypsy Kings’ Greatest Hits'' piped loudly into her cell non-stop, 24 hours a day, and has taken to documenting settlement provisions by way of drowning out the existential pain — of what happens if someone is meant to deliver you some allowances but, without excuse, they don’t. You might think buy in provisions from a stock loan might have been a useful model for such a clause; so did I — but EFET’s {{cds}} didn’t and, unfortunately, ''they'' were the ones sitting in the padded cell trying to banish the very living idea of ''Bamboleo''. | ||
So here we are. | So here we are. | ||