Template:Emissions transfer of allowances summ: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Note, in any case, its moderation in IETA ({{ietaprov|5.2}}) whereby one has an obligation to make sure there are sufficient allowances in your account to satisfy your delivery obligation. So even though you can’t be forced to deliver from anywhere else, you ''can'' be sued for losses arising from your failure to ensure there was something to deliver in your {{ietaprov|Holding Account}}. All rather cack-handed, but in “fundamental upshot” terms, this does get to the right place.
Note, in any case, its moderation in IETA ({{ietaprov|5.2}}) whereby one has an obligation to make sure there are sufficient allowances in your account to satisfy your delivery obligation. So even though you can’t be forced to deliver from anywhere else, you ''can'' be sued for losses arising from your failure to ensure there was something to deliver in your {{ietaprov|Holding Account}}. All rather cack-handed, but in “fundamental upshot” terms, this does get to the right place.


The transfer is done once the {{{{{1}}}|Allowances}} hit the {{{{{1}}}|Receiving Party}}’s account (I know, I know: ''you don’t say''.) But wait: there is an interesting use of the word “[[whereupon]]” here, upon which we dwell in a bit more detail in the premium section.
The transfer is done once the {{{{{1}}}|Allowances}} hit the {{{{{1}}}RP}}’s account (I know, I know: ''you don’t say''.) But wait: there is an interesting use of the word “[[whereupon]]” here, upon which we dwell in a bit more detail in the premium section.

Navigation menu