83,547
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Note, in any case, its moderation in IETA ({{ietaprov|5.2}}) whereby one has an obligation to make sure there are sufficient allowances in your account to satisfy your delivery obligation. So even though you can’t be forced to deliver from anywhere else, you ''can'' be sued for losses arising from your failure to ensure there was something to deliver in your {{ietaprov|Holding Account}}. All rather cack-handed, but in “fundamental upshot” terms, this does get to the right place. | Note, in any case, its moderation in IETA ({{ietaprov|5.2}}) whereby one has an obligation to make sure there are sufficient allowances in your account to satisfy your delivery obligation. So even though you can’t be forced to deliver from anywhere else, you ''can'' be sued for losses arising from your failure to ensure there was something to deliver in your {{ietaprov|Holding Account}}. All rather cack-handed, but in “fundamental upshot” terms, this does get to the right place. | ||
The transfer is done once the {{{{{1}}}|Allowances}} hit the {{{{{1}}} | The transfer is done once the {{{{{1}}}|Allowances}} hit the {{{{{1}}}RP}}’s account (I know, I know: ''you don’t say''.) But wait: there is an interesting use of the word “[[whereupon]]” here, upon which we dwell in a bit more detail in the premium section. |