83,492
edits
Legal opinion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
They will not address matters of fact — so you will find counsel drawing petulant distinctions between whether a “derivative” is a qualifying investment for a given issuer, and whether the contract you have identified, which ''calls'' itself “a derivative”, is documented under ISDA and so forth, is in fact what it says it is — nor matters of ''foreign'' law, in which the legal eagle in question has no mandate to express any opinion. | They will not address matters of fact — so you will find counsel drawing petulant distinctions between whether a “derivative” is a qualifying investment for a given issuer, and whether the contract you have identified, which ''calls'' itself “a derivative”, is documented under ISDA and so forth, is in fact what it says it is — nor matters of ''foreign'' law, in which the legal eagle in question has no mandate to express any opinion. | ||
===Obligations binding representations=== | |||
{{obligations binding as a representation}} | |||
===The now, and the future=== | ===The now, and the future=== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
*[[Netting opinion]] | *[[Netting opinion]] | ||
*[[Would-level opinion]] | *[[Would-level opinion]] | ||
*[[Obligations binding]] | |||
{{Ref}} | {{Ref}} | ||