83,240
edits
The Moorcock - Case Note: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{a|jclr|}}Plaintiff ship-owners contracted with the defendant wharf owner to discharge a ship at their jetty on a tidal stretch of the River Thames where, at low tide, boats would regularly ground. The defendants had no rights or control over the river-bed, took no steps to determine whether it was safe and, at low tide, the Moorcock’s hull was damaged upon grounding. The plaintiffs claimed for breach of contract, seeking to imply a term that the river bed was safe...."
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{a|jclr|}}Plaintiff ship-owners contracted with the defendant wharf owner to discharge a ship at their jetty on a tidal stretch of the River Thames where, at low tide, boats would regularly ground. The defendants had no rights or control over the river-bed, took no steps to determine whether it was safe and, at low tide, the Moorcock’s hull was damaged upon grounding. The plaintiffs claimed for breach of contract, seeking to imply a term that the river bed was safe....") |
(No difference)
|