The future of office work: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{freeessay|work|working from home|{{image|sheeple|jpg|''Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheeple? {{vsr|1959}}}}}}COVID’s aftermath will reverberate long after the last “keep your goddamn distance” notice has disappeared from the [[public domain]]. The sudden dislocation was its own [[Burgess Shale]]: it punctured a long equilibrium giving us a unique chance to see what would, and could happen in a time of sudden worldwide ''change''.  
{{freeessay|work|working from home|{{image|sheeple|jpg|''Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheeple? {{vsr|1959}}}}}}As the inquest into what the politicians did and did not get right with COVID, the rest of the world is making its own assessment: what to make of it all? What can we learn? How do we do things differently? In its , abrupt dislocation, lockdown was a sort of miniature [[Burgess Shale]] —  a sudden, dissonant punctuation in a long, flowing, paragraph of commercial consensus. A rare chance to “beta-test” alternative ways of conducting commercial activity. It would be a shame to waste it, or pay no heed to the lessons it offers.  


Mark it well: as seismic changes do, COVID came out of a clear blue sky. Not one [[change manager]] had been pre-alerted. No opco decks were presented. No [[business continuity plan]]s invoked. Yet, in businesses great and small around the world, unprecedented change went through, overnight, with barely a hitch.  
As seismic changes do, COVID came out of a clear blue sky. Not one [[change manager]] was ready or, as it turned out, even needed. The world just ''changed''. No strategies needed presenting, not consultants were engaged, no [[business continuity plan]]s were invoked. There was not time.  


(It rather begs the question what good all those [[change manager]]s and [[BCM]] programmes do, but that is another story.)
Yet, in businesses great and small, all around the world, profound change went through, without warning, overnight, with barely a hitch. (It rather begs the question what good all those strategies, consultants, [[change manager]]s and [[BCM]] programmes do, but that is another story.)


In any case, never — not even in a time of war has even ''one'' nation’s citizenry been put in indefinite quarantine for months on end, let alone ''all'' of them. And — it was mostly okay, right?<ref>Of course, a deadly pandemic wasn’t ''okay'', but, all told, it could have been a great deal worse.</ref> We learned some new things: working from home is pretty cool! [[Pyjamas]]! Zoom! Kids rushing in at embarrassing moments!  
For ''never'', not even in a time of war, has even ''one'' nation’s citizenry been quarantined indefinitely for months on end, let alone ''all'' of them. We quickly adapted, and quickly learned: working from home is pretty cool! [[Pyjamas]]! Zoom! Kids rushing in at embarrassing moments!  


As COVID receded, [[Thought leader|thought-leaders]] took to [[LinkedIn]] and [[Twitter]] to grapple with ''What It All Means For The Future Of Work''.  
As the immediate lockdowns ended, there was no great snap back to the previous regime. Many stayed at home, at least for part of the week. Some thought this was a good idea, others did not.  


They fell broadly into two camps: ''everything,'' and ''nothing''.
[[Thought leader|Thought-leaders]] took to [[LinkedIn]] to grapple with ''What It All Means For The Future Of Work'' and fell broadly into two camps: ''everything'' has changed,” and ''nothing'' has”.


===== This time is different =====
===== Everything has changed =====
The first said, “[[This time it’s different|this time is different]].   
The first said, “[[This time it’s different|this time is different]]. There is no going back”.   


The scales have fallen, we are no longer in the ’60s and  though we can now leave our homes without being arrested, we shouldn’t ''have'' to any more. A diverse, dynamic economy of gig-working, side-hustling cosmopolitan youngsters ''requires'' flexibility. Since we now know business ''can'' manage it — right? — there is no reason it ''shouldn’t''.   
The scales have fallen, we are no longer in the ’60s and  though we can now leave our homes without being arrested, we shouldn’t ''have'' to any more. A diverse, dynamic economy of gig-working, side-hustling cosmopolitan youngsters ''requires'' flexibility. Since we now know business ''can'' manage it — right? — there is no reason it ''shouldn’t''.   


You can’t unsee it: flexible working is now a fact of commercial life.  
''You can’t unsee it'': flexible working is now a fact of commercial life.  


===== Ditch the jim-jams =====
===== Ditch the jim-jams =====
The second said, “get back into the the office, punks”.   
The second said, “get back into the the office, punks”.   


With a twist: [[The Man]] teetered for a while between “I’m not having these good-for-naught [[Meatware|meatsack]]s in their goddamn pyjamas on ''my'' dime”, and the more squirrelly “hold on: if these clowns work at home on their own PCs we can nix half the downtown footprint and slash our [[IT]] bill so let’s not rush this”.  
Well: [[The Man]] teetered for a while, between, “I’m not having these good-for-naught [[Meatware|meatsack]]s in their pyjamas on ''my'' dime”, and the more squirrelly, “hang on: if these clowns work at home we can nix half the downtown footprint and slash our [[technology]] spend so let’s not rush this”. Sometimes these two impulses merged, and businesses ditched office space ''and'' ordered everyone back to work.  
 
Sometimes the two impulses merged and compromised: businesses ditched half their office space ''and'' ordered everyone back to work.  


==== TikTok Girl and the future of work ====
==== TikTok Girl and the future of work ====
The debate chuntered on, recently coagulating around poor “TikTok Girl”, a tearful grad confiding to her social media channel the exhausting experience of having to commute, work an eight-hour day and then commute home again.  
The debate chuntered on. Recently, it coagulating around poor “TikTok Girl”, a tearful grad confiding to her TikTok account<ref>https://www.tiktok.com/@brielleybelly123/video/7291443944347405614</ref> the exhausting experience of having to commute, work an eight-hour day and then commute home again.  


{{quote|
{{quote|
Line 35: Line 33:
Notable among TikTok Girl’s supporters was {{plainlink|https://kylascanlon.com/|Kyla Scanlon}}, a whip-smart “influencer” with a Bloomberg column, guest essays in the New York Times and the best part of half a million [[followers]] of her own frenetic TikToks,<ref>[https://x.com/kylascan/status/1704626243402895435 Here’s one].</ref> podcasts, [[Twitter|tweets]], blogs and so on.<ref>https://kyla.substack.com/p/the-tiktok-girl-is-right-modernity</ref>  
Notable among TikTok Girl’s supporters was {{plainlink|https://kylascanlon.com/|Kyla Scanlon}}, a whip-smart “influencer” with a Bloomberg column, guest essays in the New York Times and the best part of half a million [[followers]] of her own frenetic TikToks,<ref>[https://x.com/kylascan/status/1704626243402895435 Here’s one].</ref> podcasts, [[Twitter|tweets]], blogs and so on.<ref>https://kyla.substack.com/p/the-tiktok-girl-is-right-modernity</ref>  


Scanlon’s argument was along the following lines: back in the day, agrarian societies worked only daylight hours, giving up their circadian rhythms only when forced to by the industrial revolution. It took Henry Ford — not your ''classic'' Gen Z pin-up, but hey — to realise he would get more out of his workers if he paid them properly and gave them time off. So was born, apparently, the nine-to-five: visionary then, but that was a hundred years ago. ''[[This time it’s different|Things have since changed]].'' The nature of how we now ''are'' — networked, digital and [[onworld|online]] — and what we now ''do'' — delivering services like “B2B [[Software-as-a-service|SaaS]]” instead of making goods in factories — means [[this time it’s different|it’s different this time]].  
For context on the 9-to-5, Scanlon gives us a potted history of industrial relations, starting with agrarian societies who worked “only” daylight hours (sounds fun, right?), until forced to give this up by “Big Machine” during the late industrial revolution.  
 
Scanlon credits Henry Ford — not your ''classic'' Gen Z pin-up, but hey — for realising he would get more out of his workers by paying them properly and giving them time off. So, a hundred years ago, was born the nine-to-five.  
 
Scanlon implies things have not since changed, without really explaining why she thinks that, but declares it is now time they did. The nature of how we now ''are'' — networked, digital and [[onworld|online]] — and what we now ''do'' — delivering services like “B2B [[Software-as-a-service|SaaS]]” instead of making goods in factories — means it is “time to progress again”.
 
Let’s park our questions — such as how TikTok Girl would have liked an agrarian day out in the fields, whether one can sensibly equate factory production lines with a modern offices, or ''who'' it is that is meant to have stuck with the eight-hour day, since it definitely isn’t the financial services industry or its professional advisors<ref>The EU got so worked up about the long hours that it legislated the “Working Time Directive” in 1998, limiting weekly work hours to ''forty-eight''. Professionals have habitually opted out of it ever since.</ref> — but as we do, dispense a bit of tough parental love: an eight-hour day in an office, even with a commute at each end is, across the great sweep of human endurance, ''not that much to ask''. It might be ''dull'', sure, but that is not the question.  


Let’s take Scanlon’s potted history as read and park our questions — such as how TikTok Girl would have liked a regular agrarian day out in the fields, or ''who'' still uses the eight-hour day, since it definitely isn’t the financial services industry or its professional advisors<ref>The EU got so worked up about the long hours that it legislated the “Working Time Directive” in 1998, limiting weekly work hours to ''forty-eight''. Professionals have habitually opted out of it ever since.</ref> — but as we do, dispense a bit of tough parental love: an eight-hour day in an office downtown, even with a commute each side of it is, across the epochal sweep of human perseverance, ''no great imposition''. It might be ''dull'', sure, but that is not the question. You can’t cure boredom by working in your jim-jams from the kitchen table.
(By the way, TikTok Girl herself mainly complains about the commute and seems to accept the working day is tolerable, yet has become a lightning rod for this bigger question.)


(By the way, TikTok Girl herself only really complains about the commute, not the working day in between. Perhaps against her wishes she has become a lightning rod for a bigger question.)
Scanlon imagines a continuity in the nature of work from Henry Ford to Steven Schwartzman that really isn’t there. The nature of work — ''what'' we do, ''how'' we do it, and ''who'' does it — has changed out of all recognition. Until quite recently, “white collar” professional occupations were reserved for a highly-educated upper middle-class elite. The conversion of this remote enclave into a military-industrial complex in which the traditional professions (law, medicine and divinity!) exploded and were joined by a slew of new ones — audit, accountancy, engineering, marketing, branding, human resources, design, architecture, technology, management and operations —, happened only recently and has created an entirely new category of labour evolving its own customs, conventions and modes of operation as it has developed. It is its own complex system, dynamically adjusting how it works to the environment.


So, have things really changed? Since many businesses now deliver services rather than making things in a factory, jobs ''can'' be delivered remotely.  
Things have certainly changed since Henry Ford’s day, but working practices have changed with them.


{{quote|
{{quote|

Navigation menu