83,493
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''1994 CSA v 2016 NY VM CSA (NY law)''': But for a similar subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the {{1992isda}} and not the {{2002isda}} (which in 1995, had not been invented), the [[Original Gangsta CSA|OG CSA]] and VM CSA under NY law are functionally the same. Here is a {{diff|85108|85099}}. | '''1994 CSA v 2016 NY VM CSA (NY law)''': But for a similar subsection dealing with what should happen if you are on the {{1992isda}} and not the {{2002isda}} (which in 1995, had not been invented), the [[Original Gangsta CSA|OG CSA]] and VM CSA under NY law are functionally the same. Here is a {{diff|85108|85099}}. | ||
'''2016 VM CSA v 2018 IM CSD (English law)''': Similar again, without the agonising over the edition of the {{isdama}} you are using — possibly because it is not a Transaction under either of them?), but yet disowning the possibility of an Event of Default for non-payment in the event of a collateral dispute. So that is a bit flummoxing. But I bet there is a reason. | |||
{{diff|85123|37030}} |