Template:Csa Expenses summ: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==={{capitalise|{{ttcsa}}s}}===
The starting point here, being a function of the [[common law]] of [[contract]], not to mention common sense is that every merchant is liable for its own costs and expenses of performing a contract, so if there are costs involved in running a collateral operation, as a general matter, they are for your own account. Where this might change is as a result of a pledge: if I deliver you an asset, to hold as collateral for my obligations, then if there are any costs on you  on transfering it to you — the classic is a [[stamp duty]] or similar transfer tax — and you transferring it back to me, these should be for my account, for I get no benefit from incurring that cost.
Being a function of the [[common law]] of [[contract]], not to mention common sense — why would someone else be liable for your costs and expenses of performing a contract unless it specifically said they would be? — it falls into the goes without saying category. But {{icds}} said it anyway.
 
These considerations do not pertain to [[title transfer]] arrangements. Once you have the asset, it is yours.
 
This is a not entirely ironclad justification, by theway - expecially when you take into account the effects of [[rehypothecation]].
==={{capitalise|{{sicsa}}s}}===
==={{capitalise|{{sicsa}}s}}===
How to deal with stamp duties is the subject of Paragraphs {{nyvmcsaprov|10(b)}} and {{nyvmcsaprov|10(c)}}, of which there is no equivalent in the English law document. <br>
How to deal with stamp duties is the subject of Paragraphs {{nyvmcsaprov|10(b)}} and {{nyvmcsaprov|10(c)}}, of which there is no equivalent in the English law document. <br>
{{Csa Expenses summ {{{1}}}}}
{{Csa Expenses summ {{{1}}}}}

Navigation menu