84,207
edits
Disclosed information - NDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Removed redirect to Disclosed information - Confi Provision) Tag: Removed redirect |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|confi|}} | {{a|confi|}}The confidentiality obligation typically is restricted to information ''disclosed'' by a disclosing party to the other under a [[confidentiality agreement]]. There are other ways a party might come by confidential information, and it is worth thinking about why they might or might not be included. | ||
Generally you are protecting secret sauce: this is not an intellectual property arrangement per se — confidential information may not attract copyright protection at all, and even if it does the disclosed may not own it — so the emphasis here is preserving an advantage the disclosed has because no-one else has the information at all. | |||
Therefore information you may get in connection with a project ''but from someone else'' — that wasn’t the discloser’s secret to protect — does not attract protection just because you get it in connection with the project. | |||
and information you generate yourself in connection with the project — even though it might be quite sensitive and valuable — also does not necessarily fall within the province of an NDA. | |||
For example, a broker who handles its client’s order flow and executes on exchange accumulates a lot of sensitive trading data, but this was not “disclosed” by the customer so would not ordinarily be covered. If your NDA covers a brokerage arrangement you might want to think about that. | |||
Ideas that a creative team at an advertising agency generate while working on a customer brief, too, would not typically be captured by an NDA (and it would be fairly onerous on the ad agency if they were). | |||