Template:M intro philosophy doubt: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
Yet you need be no great student of our halting course through the cosmos to notice that, however hard we have lunged at this elusive definitude, we have had a hard time ''finding'' it.  
Yet you need be no great student of our halting course through the cosmos to notice that, however hard we have lunged at this elusive definitude, we have had a hard time ''finding'' it.  


Unexpected shit still, resolutely, ''happens''. Were it not so deeply buried in the piles of our founding mythology, we might even wonder whether our quest for [[certainty]] wasn’t, in itself, the heart of the problem.
Unexpected shit still, resolutely, ''happens''. Were it not so deeply buried in the piles [''That’s your last warning — Ed''] of our founding mythology, we might even wonder whether our quest for [[certainty]] wasn’t, in itself, the heart of the problem.


So here, readers, I present you a spirited, against-the-run-of-play, defence of ''doubt''.
So here, JC presents a spirited, against-the-run-of-play, defence of ''doubt''.


There are logical, psychological, commercial and philosophical grounds to protect it. Bear with me. Let us start at the top and work our way down to the [[elephants and turtles]].
There are logical, psychological, commercial and philosophical grounds to protect it. Let us start at the top and work our way down to the [[elephants and turtles]].


====The commercial imperative of doubt====
====The commercial imperative of doubt====

Navigation menu