84,207
edits
Template:M intro philosophy doubt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
The best answer will rarely issue from a [[legal eagle]]’s beak: “well, why in God’s name are you asking ''me''? Shouldn’t you ask your ''client''?” | The best answer will rarely issue from a [[legal eagle]]’s beak: “well, why in God’s name are you asking ''me''? Shouldn’t you ask your ''client''?” | ||
For, really, what | For, really, what use is a clause your legal teams hammered out 10 years ago in getting to the heart of the matter? If, now, your client would ''not'' like you to behave in this way, what difference does it make, to your ongoing relationship, that an ancient document says that you ''may''? Or, for that matter, ''vice versa''?<ref>Much more likely, [[the contract is silent|it ''won’t'' say you ''can’t'',]] which doesn’t really help anyone.</ref> | ||
In any case, isn’t that kind of doubt ''creative'': an opportunity for a conversation, which might lead, who knows where? | In any case, isn’t that kind of doubt ''creative'': an opportunity for a conversation, which might lead, who knows where? | ||