Texas sharpshooter: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|design|}}The famous fallacy of probabilistic reasoning. If you happen upon an event which, in the abstract is highly improbable at random, there is a tendency to impute foul play. But at the point where the event has already happened it is not a random event but ''history''. Treating it as a contingency can be misleading. Predicting that a Mr Bentos of Cheltenham will win next week’s lottery is hard. Predicting that he won ''last'' week’s is a cinch. This can...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|design|}}The famous fallacy of probabilistic reasoning. If you happen upon an event which, in the abstract is highly improbable at random, there is a tendency to impute foul play. But at the point where the event has already happened it is not a random event but ''history''. Treating it as a contingency can be misleading.  
{{a|stats|}}The famous fallacy of probabilistic reasoning. If you happen upon an event which, in the abstract is highly improbable at random, there is a tendency to impute foul play. But at the point where the event has already happened it is not a random event but ''history''. Treating it as a contingency can be misleading.  


Predicting that a Mr Bentos of Cheltenham will win next week’s lottery is hard. Predicting that he won ''last'' week’s is a cinch.
Predicting that a Mr Bentos of Cheltenham will win next week’s lottery is hard. Predicting that he won ''last'' week’s is a cinch.

Navigation menu