Search results

Page title matches

• Legal advice privilege
  #REDIRECT [[privilege]]
  23 bytes (2 words) - 13:19, 3 October 2017
• Legal professional privilege
  #redirect[[privilege]]
  22 bytes (2 words) - 09:26, 12 September 2018

Page text matches

• RBS Rights Issue Litigation
  ..., as the employees in question did not form part of the “client” for {{tag|privilege}} purposes *[[privilege]]
  401 bytes (59 words) - 19:21, 19 December 2020
• Three Rivers No. 5
  ...65}} is a controversial decision of the UK Court of Appeal about legal {{t|privilege}}. ...tigation. That is because, unlike [[litigation privilege]], [[legal advice privilege]] does not apply to communications with third parties; it only covers lawye
  4 KB (569 words) - 19:29, 19 December 2020
• Privilege
  ...ncerning litigation, is a bad idea. If your client is guilted into waiving privilege, your cavalier statements might be broadcast live on the BBC. Just ask Amy ====Inhouse legal eagles====
  2 KB (366 words) - 11:43, 18 April 2024
• Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation
  ...was a civil claim brought by the [[SFO]] challenging ENRC’s claim to {{tag|privilege}} in respect of various documents created in anticipation of criminal inves ...folk as, at a stroke, destroying the very concept of [[legal professional privilege]] inside organisations (like lovely [[investment bank]]s) big enough to emp
  6 KB (864 words) - 19:27, 19 December 2020
• Andrews J
  ...ian Natural Resources Corporation}} on the subject of [[legal professional privilege]] for in-house counsel (now overruled)
  477 bytes (70 words) - 09:25, 12 September 2018
• Professional advisers
  ...t any rate) offering them the somewhat holey cloak of [[legal professional privilege]], such that one’s usual [[paranoia]] about the disclosure of [[proprieta ...goad your client into a pointless argument — and it is a special kind of [[legal eagle]] who can resist a cheeky troll every now and then — this “profes
  3 KB (526 words) - 16:46, 4 February 2021
• This email and its contents are confidential and may be privileged
  ...d [[consideration]]. You can’t [[unilateral contract|unilaterally]] impose legal obligations on someone else who didn’t agree to assume them, for some exc And [[privilege]]? Do me a favour. Do you even know what [[privilege]] is? Oh, right. You don’t, do you? You just copied the disclaimer from a
  1 KB (224 words) - 15:38, 20 May 2020
• Firm - Risk Article
  ...risk-taking, revenue-generating roles. The rest are operational in nature (legal, operations, risk) and they are costs. These roles are incentivised by mean There is a case that the law of [[privilege]] needs to be entirely re-thought for the machine age to recognise that a [
  5 KB (755 words) - 11:36, 18 January 2020
• Permitted Receivers - OneNDA Provision
  ...ciary duties]] to respect [[confidentiality]] and may even buy you legal [[privilege]] for whatever that is worth these days. A fundamental truth, alas not recognised by many [[In-house lawyer|in-house legal eagles]]: ''you can’t absolve yourself of your own contractual obligation
  3 KB (468 words) - 10:29, 29 August 2023
• Email disclaimer
  ...n the mistaken receiver a moral — but (Law of Contracts 101 check: ''not'' legal) duty to destroy it if it was, in fact, sent in error.
  3 KB (497 words) - 16:03, 8 December 2023
• Rent-seeking
  ...JC’s own phrase, a “[[rentsmith]]”) from those who pass by, for the simple privilege of crossing one’s turf, whether they are transgressing one’s [[real pro ===[[Legal eagle]]s as rent-seekers===
  4 KB (709 words) - 10:11, 12 October 2022
• London Inter Bank Offered Rate
  ...t [[LIBOR]] was used for and how serious it might be if someone abused the privilege of helping to set it. ...eds great insight on the practical workings of the financial markets — and legal systems.
  4 KB (632 words) - 09:33, 28 March 2024
• E-discovery
  ...better: [https://www.google.com/search?q=ediscovery+has+revolutionised+the+legal+profession e-Discovery is the anecdote of choice]. ...e it, date it, record by whom it was sent and to whom, and designate its [[privilege]].
  7 KB (1,146 words) - 07:00, 23 April 2022
• The Unaccountability Machine
  With all its infrastructure, internal and external legal advice, consultancy, and, er, second sight, how did ''no-one'' stop to thin ...re but for the grace of God go I''. Post Office [[Inhouse counsel|in-house legal]] head Rodric Williams is a fifty-something expat New Zealander. His career
  13 KB (2,144 words) - 23:39, 11 May 2024
• Fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory and transparent
  ...lso be taken where trading and clearing services are provided by different legal entities belonging to the same group. ...th terms, meaning that the two parties should owe no special obligation or privilege to the other party. This approach would set the grounds for unbiased and ra
  7 KB (1,046 words) - 11:02, 14 September 2020
• Who can I share it with? - OneNDA Provision
  Some disquiet from institutional [[legal eagle]]s that “legally required” is a little narrow: To be sure, over time [[legal eagles]] have developed various ruses intended to control information in th
  13 KB (2,085 words) - 09:17, 29 August 2023
• The history of inhouse legal
  ...sterday.}}}}Once upon a time, there was hardly such a thing as an in-house legal department in a bank at all. There ''was'' one, but it was a sleepy area in ...ure nothing went wrong. Meanwhile, the ashen men and women of the in-house legal team were hardly involved, at least until it came time to have a charge reg
  23 KB (3,707 words) - 21:19, 15 March 2023
• 1987 ISDA wikitext
  ...isda87prov|Credit Support Document}} to which it is a party constitute its legal, valid and binding obligations, enforceable in accordance with their respec ...hat right, power or privilege or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege.<br>
  71 KB (11,806 words) - 15:44, 30 January 2024