Search results

...u came, good sir or madame: there is no such equivalent provision in the {{pgmsla}}.

...Clause|Lender|comp}}Lender is defined only in the Parties section of the {{pgmsla}}

...is with the [[4.3 - Pledge GMSLA Provision|equivalent provision]] in the {{pgmsla}}, wouldn’t it. Back! Sure enough, paragraph {{pgmslaprov|4.3}} of the {{pgmsla}} doesn’t mention {{pgmslaprov|Collateral}}, since it is never title tran

{{a|pgmsla| ...ounterparty types — for example, [[UCITS]] funds — for whom the standard {{pgmsla}} doesn’t work.

!{{Pgmsla}}

...l}} ([[as the case may be]])”, since {{pgmslaprov|Collateral}} under the {{pgmsla}} is not [[Title transfer collateral arrangement|title-transferred]] in the

==Full text of the {{pgmsla}}==

{{a|pgmsla|{{subtable|'''{{pgmsla}}'''<br>{{2018 GMSLA TOC}}}}}}===What is the [[Pledge GMSLA]]?=== ...a [[Tri-party collateral arrangement|tri-party collateral system]]. The {{pgmsla}} is designed to reduce the {{pgmslaprov|borrower}}’s [[LRD]] charges, in

...nt. Compare with the new York law {{msla}} and, latterly the English law {{pgmsla}}.

...ernational Securities Lending Association]]. Publisher of the {{gmsla}}, {{pgmsla}} and the American {{msla}} — but for how much longer after ISDA’s rece

** The new {{pgmsla}}

===={{pgmsla}}====