Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort. Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus: {{Box|Their lordships do not believe that t...")
 
(No difference)

Revision as of 10:27, 28 June 2016

A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort.

Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus:

Their lordships do not believe that there is anything to the advantage of the law's development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship.

Sadly, overruled bu Henderson v Merrett.

See