Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort. Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus: {{Box|Their lordships do not believe that t...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Tai Hing Cotton Mills v Liu Chong Hing Bank - Case Note to Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank - Case Note) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 10:27, 28 June 2016
A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort.
Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus:
- Their lordships do not believe that there is anything to the advantage of the law's development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship.
Sadly, overruled bu Henderson v Merrett.