Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) m (Amwelladmin moved page Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank - Case Note to Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 19:28, 19 December 2020
The Jolly Contrarian Law Reports
Our own, snippy, in-house court reporting service.
|
A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort.
Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus:
Their lordships do not believe that there is anything to the advantage of the law’s development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship.
Sadly, overruled by Henderson v Merrett.
A good chap, that Lord Scarman.