Tai Hing Cotton Mill v Liu Chong Hing Bank

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 10:16, 28 June 2016 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort. Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus: {{Box|Their lordships do not believe that t...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A case, sadly now discredited, on concurrent liability in contract and tort.

Neatly summed up by Lord Scarman, thus:

Their lordships do not believe that there is anything to the advantage of the law's development in searching for a liability in tort where the parties are in a contractual relationship.

Sadly, overruled bu Henderson v Merrett.

See