Tax Event Upon Merger - ISDA Provision

In gory detail

1992 ISDA 5(b)(iii) Tax Event Upon Merger. The party (the “Burdened Party”) on the next succeeding Scheduled Payment Date will either (1) be required to pay an additional amount in respect of an Indemnifiable Tax under Section 2(d)(i)(4) (except in respect of interest under Section 2(e), 6(d)(ii) or 6(e)) or (2) receive a payment from which an amount has been deducted or withheld for or on account of any Indemnifiable Tax in respect of which the other party is not required to pay an additional amount (other than by reason of Section 2(d)(i)(4)(A) or (B)), in either case as a result of a party consolidating or amalgamating with, or merging with or into, or transferring all or substantially all its assets to, another entity (which will be the Affected Party) where such action does not constitute an event described in Section 5(a)(viii); (view template)

2002 ISDA 5(b)(iii) Tax Event. Due to (1) any action taken by a taxing authority, or brought in a court of competent jurisdiction, after a Transaction is entered into (regardless of whether such action is taken or brought with respect to a party to this Agreement) or (2) a Change in Tax Law, the party (which will be the Affected Party) will, or there is a substantial likelihood that it will, on the next succeeding Scheduled Settlement Date (A) be required to pay to the other party an additional amount in respect of an Indemnifiable Tax under Section 2(d)(i)(4) (except in respect of interest under Section 9(h)) or (B) receive a payment from which an amount is required to be deducted or withheld for or on account of a Tax (except in respect of interest under Section 9(h)) and no additional amount is required to be paid in respect of such Tax under Section 2(d)(i)(4) (other than by reason of Section 2(d)(i)(4)(A) or (B)); The line breaks are for comprehension and do not appear in the original (view template)

See Also

Numbering Discrepancy: Note the numbering discrepancy in Section 5(b) between the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA. This is caused by a new 5(b)(ii) (Force Majeure Event) in the 2002 ISDA before Tax Event, which is thus shunted from Section 5(b)(ii) (in the 1992 ISDA) to Section 5(b)(iii) (in the 2002 ISDA).

1992 ISDA Master Agreement

(iii) Tax Event Upon Merger. The party (the “Burdened Party”) on the next succeeding Scheduled
Payment Date will either (1) be required to pay an additional amount in respect of an Indemnifiable
Tax under Section 2(d)(i)(4) (except in respect of interest under Section 2(e), 6(d)(ii) or 6(e)) or
(2) receive a payment from which an amount has been deducted or withheld for or on account of
any Indemnifiable Tax in respect of which the other party is not required to pay an additional amount
(other than by reason of Section 2(d)(i)(4)(A) or (B)), in either case as a result of a party
consolidating or amalgamating with, or merging with or into, or transferring all or substantially all
its assets to, another entity (which will be the Affected Party) where such action does not constitute
an event described in Section 5(a)(viii);

2002 ISDA Master Agreement

(iv) Tax Event Upon Merger. The party (the “Burdened Party”) on the next succeeding Scheduled
Settlement Date will either (1) be required to pay an additional amount in respect of an Indemnifiable
Tax under Section 2(d)(i)(4) (except in respect of interest under Section 9(h)) or
(2) receive a payment from which an amount has been deducted or withheld for or on account of
any Tax in respect of which the other party is not required to pay an additional amount
(other than by reason of Section 2(d)(i)(4)(A) or (B)), in either case as a result of a party
consolidating or amalgamating with, or merging with or into, or transferring all or substantially all
its assets (or any substantial part of the assets comprising the business conducted by it as of the
date of this Master Agreement) to, or reorganising, reincorporating or reconstituting into or as,
another entity (which will be the Affected Party) where such action does not constitute a Merger Without Assumption;

Commentary

Note the missing "indemnifiable" from the fifth line of the 2002 version (our 1992 Schedule amended for this). Note also the expanded description of merger events towards the end of the clause.