Template:Ddq capsule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "How legal eagles should respond to requests to help fill out due diligence questionnaires: <br> Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:<br> “That is a matter of...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''The [[JC]]’s practical guide for [[legal eagle]]s on how to respond to requests to help fill out [[due diligence questionnaire]]s:'' | |||
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:<br> | Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:<br> | ||
“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a [[due diligence questionnaire]]. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”<br> | “That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a [[due diligence questionnaire]]. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”<br> | ||
“That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely | “That is a matter of [[fact]]. I am a [[lawyer]]. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in [[operations]].” | ||
Revision as of 14:05, 10 June 2021
The JC’s practical guide for legal eagles on how to respond to requests to help fill out due diligence questionnaires:
Choose any ONE (1) of the following answers:
“That is a matter of legal interpretation and not an appropriate subject for a due diligence questionnaire. If the client wants to know this, they should ask their lawyers.”
“That is a matter of fact. I am a lawyer. I have trained for many years precisely to avoid questions like this. I neither know nor care about “facts”. I exist on a higher jurisprudential plane. Go and ask someone in operations.”