Template:Form and substance capsule: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
====Form versus substance in a nutshell====
====Form versus substance in a nutshell====
Form is the [[Map|map]]: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It ''tries'' to reduces ''complexity'' to ''complication'' by prescribing fixed rules and procedures which maybe followed even by those with no particular experience or expertise of the [[territory]]. The only judgment made of one in a formal system is, ''did you faithfully follow the rules?''
[[Form]] is the [[Map|map]]: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It tries to reduce ''[[complexity]]'' — scary, unmanageable, non-linear — to mere ''[[Complicated system|complication]]'' — fiddly, but tamable by punctilious attention to the ''detail'' by prescribing fixed rules and procedures — [[process]] — which maybe followed even by those with no particular experience or expertise of the [[territory]], as long as they can ''read'' and are generally disposed to quickly and quietly ''doing what they are told''. The only judgment made of one in a formal system is, ''did you faithfully follow the rules?''


Substance is the [[Territory|territory]]: the fractal, inchoate, interdeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Unless you have a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by ''knowing'' it. Someone who knows the territory — an ''[[Subject matter expert|expert]]'' — doesn’t need maps, and is liable to be frustrated by people who insist on using them for simple journeys.
[[Substance and form|Substance]] is the [[Territory|territory]]: the fractal, inchoate, interdeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Without a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by ''knowing'' it. Knowledge is an investment of time, patience, energy and skill. A map is a proxy, not a substitute for knowledge: one who knows the territory — an ''[[Subject matter expert|expert]]'' — will bridle upon being told to use a map. Would you use a map to navigate to your own house?
 
For the inexpert, maps, [[Tick box exercise|tickable boxes]], checkable [[Checklist|checklists]], and [[Internal audit|auditable trails]], give them comfort that they are safe from harm. They take the ''easy'' road: rather than evaluate the ''qualities'' of their environment, they tally up its countable dimensions and proceed on that limited account.

Revision as of 15:28, 1 September 2023

Form versus substance in a nutshell

Form is the map: simplified, rationalised, modularised: it establishes through followable rules, a safe passage through the incomprehensible thickness of the jungle. It tries to reduce complexity — scary, unmanageable, non-linear — to mere complication — fiddly, but tamable by punctilious attention to the detail — by prescribing fixed rules and procedures — process — which maybe followed even by those with no particular experience or expertise of the territory, as long as they can read and are generally disposed to quickly and quietly doing what they are told. The only judgment made of one in a formal system is, did you faithfully follow the rules?

Substance is the territory: the fractal, inchoate, interdeterminate, dancing, organic mass of messiness in which we are consigned to play our mortal games. Without a map, there is only one way to navigate the territory: by knowing it. Knowledge is an investment of time, patience, energy and skill. A map is a proxy, not a substitute for knowledge: one who knows the territory — an expert — will bridle upon being told to use a map. Would you use a map to navigate to your own house?