Template:Isda 6(e)(iii) summ: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Section {{{{{1}}}|6(e)(iii)}} is somewhat gnomic, but is designed to build in some flex to allow for the weird things that happen in the netherworld of corporate insolvency, especially where your {{{{{1}}}|Early Termination Date}} happened, thanks to its [[automatic early termination|automatic]] trigger, ''without anyone knowing about it''.  
Section {{{{{1}}}|6(e)(iii)}} is somewhat gnomic, but is designed to build in some flex to allow for the weird things that happen in the netherworld of corporate insolvency, especially where your {{{{{1}}}|Early Termination Date}} happened, thanks to its [[automatic early termination|automatic]] trigger, ''without anyone knowing about it''.  


If an [[AET]] has been “”Therefore if the parties (especially the {{{{{1}}}|Non-Defaulting Party}}) blithely carried on with their business of making payments and deliveries unaware that the technical insolvency of one of them meant all payment and delivery obligations were suspended — Section {{{{{1}}}|2(a)(iii)}} and all that — then you will find you have the opposite of Unpaid Amounts: you will have ''overpaid'' Amounts.
If an [[AET]] has been “dark triggered” (this is an expression I made up to cover an event that has happened to the contract by operation of circumstance without the knowledge of either party), and therefore the parties (especially the {{{{{1}}}|Non-Defaulting Party}}) have blithely carried on with their business of making payments and deliveries unaware that the technical insolvency of one of them meant all payment and delivery obligations were suspended — Section {{{{{1}}}|2(a)(iii)}} and all that — then you will find you have the opposite of {{{{{1}}}|Unpaid Amounts}}: you will have ''overpaid'' Amounts. This provision half-heartedly allows you to adjust to take account of them, without saying how: can you credit their full amount back? Do you have to apply some recovery rate?
 
We suspect most counterparties will credit the full amount and wait, with arguments pre-marshalled about [[Insolvency set-off|insolvency set-off]] and restitution for [[money had and received]], for use should the [[insolvency administrator]] comes at them.

Latest revision as of 11:38, 5 January 2023

Section {{{{{1}}}|6(e)(iii)}} is somewhat gnomic, but is designed to build in some flex to allow for the weird things that happen in the netherworld of corporate insolvency, especially where your {{{{{1}}}|Early Termination Date}} happened, thanks to its automatic trigger, without anyone knowing about it.

If an AET has been “dark triggered” (this is an expression I made up to cover an event that has happened to the contract by operation of circumstance without the knowledge of either party), and therefore the parties (especially the {{{{{1}}}|Non-Defaulting Party}}) have blithely carried on with their business of making payments and deliveries unaware that the technical insolvency of one of them meant all payment and delivery obligations were suspended — Section {{{{{1}}}|2(a)(iii)}} and all that — then you will find you have the opposite of {{{{{1}}}|Unpaid Amounts}}: you will have overpaid Amounts. This provision half-heartedly allows you to adjust to take account of them, without saying how: can you credit their full amount back? Do you have to apply some recovery rate?

We suspect most counterparties will credit the full amount and wait, with arguments pre-marshalled about insolvency set-off and restitution for money had and received, for use should the insolvency administrator comes at them.