Template:M comp disc 2016 CSA 2(a): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Now the interesting thing here is the difference that ''pledged'' collateral under the {{nyvmcsa}} makes over ''title-transferred'' collateral re...")
 
(Replaced content with "{{csa 2(a) comp|vmcsa}}")
Tag: Replaced
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Now the interesting thing here is the difference that ''[[pledge|pledged]]'' collateral under the {{nyvmcsa}} makes over ''[[Title transfer|title-transferred]]'' collateral regime of the {{csa}}. You will see the difference in the {{nycsa}}’s {{nyvmcsaprov|Delivery Amount}}, which is the positive difference between {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}’s {{nyvmcsaprov|Exposure}} and the value of {{nyvmcsaprov|Posted Credit Support}} ''held by the {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}}'' — easy, right? — and {{vmcsa}}’s equivalent provision which is the positive difference between the {{vmcsaprov|Transferee}}’s {{vmcsaprov|Exposure}} and the {{vmcsaprov|Credit Support Balance}} ''adjusted to exclude any inflight but unsettled collateral movements''.
{{csa 2(a) comp|vmcsa}}
 
The English version is a bit more leaden but these amount to the same thing: You don’t get any credit (support) for collateral ''until it has landed with the other party''.

Revision as of 15:28, 26 February 2021

Now the interesting thing here is the difference that pledged collateral under the New York law versions of the CSA makes over title-transferred collateral regime of the English law versions. You will see the difference in the NY law version’s 2016 VM CSA, which is the positive difference between Secured Party’s 2016 VM CSA and the value of Posted Credit Support held by the Secured Party — easy, right? — and the equivalent provision in the English law versions which is the positive difference between the 2016 VM CSA’s 2016 VM CSA and the 2016 VM CSA adjusted to exclude any inflight but unsettled collateral movements.

The English law versions are a bit more leaden in how they describe things but these amount to the same thing: you don’t get any credit (support) for collateral until it has landed with the other party.

This creates some curious scenarios, as you will see.

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_comp_disc_2016_CSA_2(a)&oldid=54517"