Template:M comp disc EUA Annex (d)(i)(1): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{emissions comparison|{{euaprov|Settlement}}|{{ietaprov|Primary Obligation}}|{{efetaprov|Delivery, Acceptance and Scheduling Obligations}}}}
{{emissions comparison|{{euaprov|Settlement}}|{{efetaprov|Delivery, Acceptance and Scheduling Obligations}}|{{ietaprov|Primary Obligation}}}}


'''[[Situation normal]]... ''': Techy drafting slip from {{icds}}: “Number of Allowances to be Delivered” isn’t a thing: there is “{{euaprov|Number of Allowances}}”, which is the notional size of the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, and then there is {{euaprov|Allowances to be Delivered}} which references the particular number of Allowances to be settled under an {{euaprov|Option}} and thus already builds in a number.
'''[[Situation normal]]... ''': Techy drafting slip from {{icds}}: “Number of Allowances to be Delivered” isn’t a thing: there is “{{euaprov|Number of Allowances}}”, which is the notional size of the {{euaprov|Transaction}}, and then there is {{euaprov|Allowances to be Delivered}} which references the particular number of Allowances to be settled under an {{euaprov|Option}} and thus already builds in a number.

Latest revision as of 08:20, 17 April 2024

The same broad concept is dealt with as follows:

Situation normal... : Techy drafting slip from ISDA’s crack drafting squad™: “Number of Allowances to be Delivered” isn’t a thing: there is “Number of Allowances”, which is the notional size of the Transaction, and then there is Allowances to be Delivered which references the particular number of Allowances to be settled under an Option and thus already builds in a number.