Template:M gen 2002 ISDA 2(a)(iii): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "{{isda 2(a)(iii) gen|isdaprov}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} litigation===
{{isda 2(a)(iii) gen|isdaprov}}
There is a (generous) handful of important authorities on the effect under [[English law]] or [[New York law]] of the suspension of obligations under Section {{isdaprov|2(a)(iii)}} of the {{isdama}}, and whether [[flawed asset]] provision amounts to an “[[ipso facto]] clause” under the [[US Bankruptcy Code]] or violates the “[[anti-deprivation]]” principle under [[English law]]. Those cases are:
 
===Resources===
*{{casenote|Lomas|Firth Rixson}}
*{{casenote|Marine Trade|Pioneer}}
*{{casenote|Pioneer|Cosco}}
*{{casenote|Pioneer|TMT}}
*{{casenote|Enron|TXU}}
*{{casenote|Metavante|Lehman}}

Latest revision as of 09:01, 14 April 2023