Template:M summ GMSLA 17: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "200px|frameless|rightInterestingly ICMA’s {{cds}} elected not to use the expression a “single agreement”, so beloved of {{icds}} and th...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Dramatic Look Gopher.gif|200px|frameless|right]]Interestingly ICMA’s {{cds}} elected not to use the expression a “single agreement”, so beloved of {{icds}} and the [[ISDA ninja|ninjas]] of the [[eye-ess-dee-aye]]. Why? We may never know. But the point is purely to defeat the mendacious designs of insolvency administrators in far flung locales who may take it into their heads to pick apart valuable Loan exposures in their estate’s favour. That is to say — is that the [[dramatic look gopher]] I hear? — to be a [[cherry-picker]]. | [[File:Dramatic Look Gopher.gif|200px|frameless|right]][[17 - GMSLA Provision|Interestingly]] ICMA’s {{cds}} elected not to use the expression a “single agreement”, so beloved of {{icds}} and the [[ISDA ninja|ninjas]] of the [[eye-ess-dee-aye]]. Why? We may never know. But the point is purely to defeat the mendacious designs of insolvency administrators in far flung locales who may take it into their heads to pick apart valuable Loan exposures in their estate’s favour. That is to say — is that the [[dramatic look gopher]] I hear? — to be a [[cherry-picker]]. | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 21 January 2021
Interestingly ICMA’s crack drafting squad™ elected not to use the expression a “single agreement”, so beloved of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ and the ninjas of the eye-ess-dee-aye. Why? We may never know. But the point is purely to defeat the mendacious designs of insolvency administrators in far flung locales who may take it into their heads to pick apart valuable Loan exposures in their estate’s favour. That is to say — is that the dramatic look gopher I hear? — to be a cherry-picker.