Template:M summ GMSLA 27: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A grab-bag of the usual miscellany, paranoia and wrong-headedness that populates the back-end of most commercial contracts these days, with pointless things (l...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A grab-bag of the usual miscellany, paranoia and wrong-headedness that populates the [[Boilerplate|back-end]] of most commercial contracts these days, with pointless things (like a [[counterparts]] clause), logically self-defeating ones (like a [[warranty]] ''in'' a standard form that the standard form hasn’t been subsequently amended, except where it has been), and positively pernicious ones (like a [[no oral modification]] clause, though admittedly the [[JC]] is in a minority in seeing these as pernicious). | [[27 - GMSLA Provision|A]] grab-bag of the usual miscellany, paranoia and wrong-headedness that populates the [[Boilerplate|back-end]] of most commercial contracts these days, with pointless things (like a [[counterparts]] clause), logically self-defeating ones (like a [[warranty]] ''in'' a standard form that the standard form hasn’t been subsequently amended, except where it has been), and positively pernicious ones (like a [[no oral modification]] clause, though admittedly the [[JC]] is in a minority in seeing these as pernicious). | ||
Latest revision as of 08:56, 17 September 2021
A grab-bag of the usual miscellany, paranoia and wrong-headedness that populates the back-end of most commercial contracts these days, with pointless things (like a counterparts clause), logically self-defeating ones (like a warranty in a standard form that the standard form hasn’t been subsequently amended, except where it has been), and positively pernicious ones (like a no oral modification clause, though admittedly the JC is in a minority in seeing these as pernicious).