Template:Multiple Transaction Payment Netting: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "===Multiple Transaction Payment Netting=== “'''{{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}}'''” is a defined term introduced in the {{2002ma}} in place of the more cl...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Tag: Blanking
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Multiple Transaction Payment Netting===
“'''{{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}}'''” is a defined term introduced in the {{2002ma}} in place of the more clunky {{1992isda}} language set out in Section {{isdaprov|2(c)}}.


In the {{1992isda}}, to specify that netting across transactions would apply, you must '''disapply''' Section {{isdaprov|2(c)(ii)}}. Counterintuitive, but true (because otherwise netting only applies ''in respect of the same {{isdaprov|Transaction}}'').
That is partly why, in the {{2002isda}} they introduced the more intuitive {{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}} concept. So now you can say “{{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}} does (or does not) apply”.
Of course, the one person who is going to have ''no'' clue about how transaction netting works at an operational level is [[negotiator]] expected to thrash this out in the doc.
Now, seeing as (per above) payment netting is an operational fact not a legal right as such, and it doesn’t ''need'' to be in the contract, and your [[negotiator]] will care not one row of buttons whether or not {{isdaprov|Multiple Transaction Payment Netting}} applies or not, you might think it wise to put something diffident like “''The parties will agree any Multiple Transaction Payment Netting arrangements separately as an operational matter''.”

Latest revision as of 10:21, 24 December 2023