Template:Nutshell 2002 ISDA 5(b)(i): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
:{{isdaprov|5(b)(i)}} '''{{isdaprov|Illegality}}'''. Taking account of any fallbacks and remedies in the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}, for reasons beyond the affected party's control, (not counting a lack of authorisation required under Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}}), it would be illegal in any relevant  jurisdiction to comply with any material term of a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} or {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}. <br>
:{{isdaprov|5(b)(i)}} '''{{isdaprov|Illegality}}'''. Taking account of any fallbacks and remedies in the {{isdaprov|Transaction}}, for reasons beyond the {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}’s control, (not counting a lack of authorisation required under Section {{isdaprov|4(b)}}), it would be illegal in any relevant  jurisdiction to comply with any material term of a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} or {{isdaprov|Credit Support Document}}. <br>

Latest revision as of 16:19, 26 February 2020

5(b)(i) Illegality. Taking account of any fallbacks and remedies in the Transaction, for reasons beyond the Affected Party’s control, (not counting a lack of authorisation required under Section 4(b)), it would be illegal in any relevant jurisdiction to comply with any material term of a Transaction or Credit Support Document.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Nutshell_2002_ISDA_5(b)(i)&oldid=40871"