Template:Nutshell MiFID 2 39

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 13:40, 14 December 2018 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Article {{mifid2prov|39}} '''{{mifid2prov|Establishment of a branch}}''' 1. A {{mifid2prov|Member State}} may require that a {{mifid2prov|third-country firm}} intending to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Article 39 Establishment of a branch

1. A Member State may require that a third-country firm intending to provide investment services to clients[1] in its territory establish a branch in that Member State.

2. In such a case, the branch must have the necessary regulatory authorisation in that Member State on the following conditions:

(a) The third-country firm is appropriately regulated for the services in question in its own jurisdiction, and its local regulator has AML rules consistent with FATF recommendations[2];
(b) the third-country firm’s home regulator co-operates and shares information with competent authorities in the relevant Member State;
(c) sufficient initial capital is at free disposal of the branch;
(d) there is a responsible manager of the branch who complies with the requirement of Article 9(1);

(e) :the third-country firm’s home jurisdiction shares necessary tax information with the relevant Member State in compliance with Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital ;

(f) the third-country firm belongs to an investor-compensation scheme recognised under the Investor Compensation Schemes Directive (97/9/EC (EUR Lex)).

3. The third-country firm applies to the competent authority in the relevant Member State.

  1. Strictly, retail clients or professional clients. Therefore ECPs are out of scope?
  2. The original sentence is a horror-show — this is a best guess at summarising it