Template:Simplecontract: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "“Simple contract”s is not defined, but the context of a Limitation Act puts it in contrast to payment claims under insurance contracts — perhaps not simple...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
“[[Simple contract]]”s is not defined, but the context of a [[Limitation Act]] puts it in contrast to  payment claims under [[insurance contract]]s — perhaps not simple because of the duty of [[utmost good faith]] implied in them — who knows? —  and under certain loans, being those which:
“[[Simple contract]]is not defined, but the context of a [[Limitation Act]] puts it in contrast to  payment claims under [[insurance contract]]s — perhaps not simple because of the duty of [[utmost good faith]] implied in them — who knows? —  and under certain loans, being those which:
*do not have a fixed repayment date, ''[[and]]''
*do not have a fixed repayment date, ''[[and]]''
*do not make the repayment obligation [[Condition precedent|conditional]] on a demand for repayment”. So, a revolving credit facility, or perhaps a bank deposit.
*do not make the repayment obligation [[Condition precedent|conditional]] on a demand for repayment”. So, a revolving credit facility, or perhaps a bank deposit.

Revision as of 12:40, 7 November 2019

Simple contract” is not defined, but the context of a Limitation Act puts it in contrast to payment claims under insurance contracts — perhaps not simple because of the duty of utmost good faith implied in them — who knows? — and under certain loans, being those which:

  • do not have a fixed repayment date, and
  • do not make the repayment obligation conditional on a demand for repayment”. So, a revolving credit facility, or perhaps a bank deposit.