The devil is not in the detail. The devil is the detail

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 14:32, 13 March 2022 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Devil in the detail.png
Page 94, yesterday


A hearty collection of the JC’s pithiest adages.
Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Der Teufel mag im Detail stecken, aber Gott steckt in den Lücken![1]

Büchstein, Die Schweizer Heulsuse

It is a well-worn trope: there is so much one can commoditise, but the final mile is across ice-fields and shattered obsidian and you must walk it in the moccasins of deep expertise, lest you cut your feet to the bone. It may be true that 80 per cent of your bond documentation is boilerplate, but the rest — oof — is a monster.

Of course, the boilerplate is pretty monstrous, too.

On this commonplace is much of the magic circle’s patter premised: to give them credit, they are ably aided in it by their in-house clients, many of them refugees of the same brotherhood, and whose livelihoods are guaranteed by the same presumption.

If you make yourself really complicated, you can exclude virtually everyone.[2]

And, to be sure, should you peruse your average securitisation — here’s the prospectus for Multifamily Connecticut Avenue Securities Series 2019-01 Notes Due October 2049 — you will soon be scooping out your eyes with the proverbial spoon.

Some 25 years ago the European Commission hit upon the idea of requiring structured products manufacturers to produce a one-page summary of the key risks of financial products being offered to the public. The document, a key investor information document became a part of financial products regulation, over the immense and highly principled objections of the legal community, on the grounds that it is impossible to adequately explain the risks of a complicated legal product in fewer than the 80-100 pages it was presently taking.

The regulators replied, “well, if you can’t explain the big picture risks in a single page, the product can’t be suitable for the general public, can it?”

That our contracts must at some level, be able to be reduced to a fundamental essence isn’t just for gentle pensioners dandling grandchildren on their knees. The neurotic particularisation of risks that are, basically generic, feathers the nests of many subject matter experts.

See also

References

  1. “The Devil may be in the detail, but God is in the gaps.”
  2. With apologies to Daniel Dennett’s “if you make yourself really small, you can externalise virtually everything”.