US attorney: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Readers may detect some animus — a peculiar aversion — on [[Amwell J]]’s part to attorney’s of a North American disposition, but really he is quite fond of them, one on one. Individually [[US attorney]]s are uncommonly good, decent people, and as long as you don’t get them on the subject of US Regulation or market practice, perfectly agreeable company, especially after a few snifters. It is only when you take them as collective that the prospect palls.
Readers may detect some animus — a peculiar aversion — on [[Amwell J]]’s part to [[US attorney|attorneys of a North American disposition]], but really he is quite fond of them, one on one. Individually, [[US attorney]]s are uncommonly good, decent people, and as long as you don’t get them onto the subject of {{tag|US Securities Regulation}} or market practice, perfectly agreeable company, especially as the evening draws on. Only when taken as a collective does the prospect pall.


For they — and the institutions that have shaped them and which they comprise — have come up with some of the most confounded gouts of articulated of nonsense ever to don a pair of stilts.  
For they — and the institutions that have shaped them and which they comprise — have come up with some of the most confounded gouts of articulated of nonsense ever to don a pair of stilts.