Universal affirmative: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Universal affirmative]]s can only be partially converted. “All of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan.” | [[Universal affirmative]]s can only be partially converted. “All of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan.” | ||
As Monty Python had it, given the premise, “all fish live | As Monty Python had it, given the premise, “all fish live underwater” and “all mackerel are fish", one cannot conclude that “if you buy kippers it will not rain", or that “trout live in trees", much less that “I do not love you any more.” | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Correlation]] and [[causation]] | *[[Correlation]] and [[causation]] | ||
*[[cognitive dissonance]] | *[[cognitive dissonance]] | ||
Revision as of 23:03, 17 March 2020
|
|
A universal affirmative is a categorical statement taking the form: “Every A is B.” where A and B are predicates. In the language of predicate logic, this can be expressed as: ∀x:A(x)⟹B(x).
Universal affirmatives can only be partially converted. “All of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan.”
As Monty Python had it, given the premise, “all fish live underwater” and “all mackerel are fish", one cannot conclude that “if you buy kippers it will not rain", or that “trout live in trees", much less that “I do not love you any more.”