Unjustified enrichment: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m (→‎top: clean up, replaced: he → {{sex|he}})
Line 1: Line 1:
Not to be confused with [[unjust enrichment]], an imaginative synthesis of long-forgotten rules of the common law dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to [[little old ladies]], ''unjustified'' enrichment is the [[compensation]] paid to a [[CEO|“C-Suite” executive]] - one of those basking [[for the time being]] in the cult of personality, known reverently to all by his -for it will be a he - [[Christian name]].
Not to be confused with [[unjust enrichment]], an imaginative synthesis of long-forgotten rules of the common law dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to [[little old ladies]], ''unjustified'' enrichment is the [[compensation]] paid to a [[CEO|“C-Suite” executive]] - one of those basking [[for the time being]] in the cult of personality, known reverently to all by his -for it will be a {{sex|he}} - [[Christian name]].


{{Seealso}}
{{Seealso}}

Revision as of 10:13, 2 September 2017

Not to be confused with unjust enrichment, an imaginative synthesis of long-forgotten rules of the common law dreamt up by Lord Goff to bring justice to little old ladies, unjustified enrichment is the compensation paid to a “C-Suite” executive - one of those basking for the time being in the cult of personality, known reverently to all by his -for it will be a he - Christian name.

See also