What if: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
815 bytes added ,  19 September 2022
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Oh, the fertile, febrile mind of a transactional lawyer.
{{a|drafting|}}Oh, the fertile, febrile mind of a [[Mediocre lawyer|transactional lawyer]].


Part of the paranoid delight of transactional drafting is catering for unforeseen [[contingencies]]. To do this, the [[draftsperson]] has many tools at her disposal: [[force majeure]] clauses, [[indemnities]], [[termination rights]], and a propensity to draft ornate, byzantine [[valuation dispute]] clauses.


But there remains in all of these a guiding principle: one should only address contingencies ''now'' that cannot predictably be resolved ''later'' — that is to say, in the unlikely event they arise. For those contingencies, one has a simpler approach: ''[[amendment]]''. For the certainty gained by catering for these contingencies comes at the cost of length, complexity, aggravation and, well, ''cost'' of finalising your contract.


{{seealso}}
{{sa}}
*[[Highly unlikely]]
*[[Force majeure]]
*[[Chicken Licken]]
*[[Chicken Licken]]
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[The farmer and his sheep]]
*[[The farmer and the sheep]]

Navigation menu