Template:1992 v 2002 comparison summary

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 13:12, 5 September 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The 2002 ISDA was introduced, primarily, to: {{gbullet|

Loss/MQ begone: Finally take out to the woodshed the whole Loss/Market Quotation farrago (and all that First Method and Second Method nonsense) by introducing the Close-out Amount.

  • Reference market makers, Settlement Amounts also begone: That meant no need for Reference Market-makers, Settlement Amounts and so on so they went too.
  • Force majeure: finally make an honest man out of , well, God, by adding a Force Majeure Event under Section 5(b)(ii) — hitherto parties had boshed up something custom each time.
  • Waiting Time for Illegality: The 2002 ISDA builds out {{{Template:1isdaprov to include the Waiting Period concept (also used in Force Majeure Event come to think of it).
  • Set-off: To finally end the gruesome cottage industry of half-arsed, half-witted set-off provisions that don’t really work, by providing an express, fully-arsed half-witted set-off provision that doesn’t really work (Set-off under Section 6(f)). }}