Equitable indemnity: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]].
Since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable [[disclaimer]].
{{ref}}

Revision as of 14:08, 24 March 2017

Not a thing.

Except in California[1].

Which reminds me:

Q: How many Californians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: None. Californians screw in spa-pools.

This gag comes to you direct from our “here all week, folks!” store of corking one-liners.

Since it isn’t a thing, its non-existence can be definitively established by deft use of a suitable disclaimer.

References