It is not in my nature: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
'''''Clarice Starling''': He kills women... '' <br>
'''''Clarice Starling''': He kills women... '' <br>
'''''Lecter''': No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?'' <br>
'''''Lecter''': No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?'' <br>
'''''Starling''': Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir...  
'''''Starling''': Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir... ''<br>
'''''Lecter''': No! He '''covets'''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet?  
'''''Lecter''': No! He '''covets'''. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet? ''<br>
}}
}}


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Frog and the scorpion]]
*[[Frog and the scorpion]]

Revision as of 10:53, 5 September 2017

A sense check one should always run before proposing a sensible, rational and logical change to a well-established process. Rational, logical and sensible processes are not always the prime motivating force when you deal with another human. Especially an attorney. What is his nature?

Lecter: First principles, Clarice. Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this man you seek?
Clarice Starling: He kills women...
Lecter: No! That is incidental. What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?
Starling: Anger ... social acceptance .... and ... sexual frustrations, sir...
Lecter: No! He covets. That is his nature. And how do we begin to covet, Clarice? Do we seek out things to covet?


See also