Such consent not to be unreasonably withheld: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "When can one withhold one’s consent? When non mentula esse. That's when. {{seealso}} *{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}} *{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} [...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
When can one withhold one’s consent? When [[non mentula esse]]. That's when.
When can one withhold one’s consent? When your watchword is “[[noli mentula esse]].  
 
That's when. As was illustrated in the recent case of {{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}}.
 
If the purpose of a covenant is for a party to achieve a certain purpose, or prevent a certain outcome, then if you use the covenant to achieve some other purpose, you’re likely to get yourself in trouble.


{{seealso}}
{{seealso}}
*[[Don’t take a piece of paper to a knife fight]]
*[[Noli mentula esse]]
*{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}}
*{{casenote|Barclays|Unicredit}}
*{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} [2018] EWHC 504 (Comm)
*{{casenote|Crowther|Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd}} [2018] EWHC 504 (Comm)
*{{casenote|AP Picture Houses|Wednesbury}}

Revision as of 11:41, 4 July 2018

When can one withhold one’s consent? When your watchword is “noli mentula esse”.

That's when. As was illustrated in the recent case of Crowther v Arbuthnot Latham & Co Ltd.

If the purpose of a covenant is for a party to achieve a certain purpose, or prevent a certain outcome, then if you use the covenant to achieve some other purpose, you’re likely to get yourself in trouble.

See also