Non-exclusive jurisdiction: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:18, 11 March 2019

Negotiation Anatomy™

Walk-away \| Escalation \| Algorithm \| Heuristic \| subject matter expert \| Operationalisation \| Playbook \| Smart contract \| Dead horse \| Knife fight \| 7 wastes \| Cruddy legal advice Index: Click ᐅ to expand: Negotiation Negotiation hacks Contract

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you. Sign up for our newsletter.

When you are fairly keen for English courts to hear disputes about your contract — and (cough) any non-contractual obligations arising out of it, but you won’t die in a ditch about it. Compare with exclusive jurisdiction.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{A|Negotiation|}}When you are fairly keen for [[English courts]] to hear disputes about your contract — and (cough) any [[non-contractual obligation]]s arising out of it, but [[I'm not going to die in a ditch about it|you won’t die in a ditch about it]]. Compare with [[exclusive jurisdiction]].
+{{A|negotiation|}}When you are fairly keen for [[English courts]] to hear disputes about your contract — and (cough) any [[non-contractual obligation]]s arising out of it, but [[I'm not going to die in a ditch about it|you won’t die in a ditch about it]]. Compare with [[exclusive jurisdiction]].
 {{isia}}
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 {{seealso}}
 *[[Governing law]]
+*[[Exclusive jurisdiction]]
+*[[Rome II]]
 *[[Non-contractual obligation]]s