|
Tags: New redirect Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| One trained in the law, genus ''[[causidicus mediocris]]'', whose principle fear is being blind-sided by the very language — English — in which {{sex|she}} must ply her trade. When you press her why she must so persistently desecrate her calling, she will tell you this:
| | #redirect[[legal eagle]] |
| | |
| “My drafting may be convoluted, but it is effective: It must be, for we haven’t had any litigation on it.”
| |
| | |
| If you have the patience, this is the time to wheel out your pre-prepared joke:
| |
| | |
| {{box|
| |
| ===The standard issue drafting joke===
| |
| | |
| “Did you know”, you say, “that, for a disguise, [[elephant]]s paint the soles of their feet yellow, and hide upside-down in custard?” <br>
| |
| “Why, that’s preposterous!”<br>
| |
| “Aha! but have you ever ''seen'' an [[elephant]] hiding upside-down in custard?”<br>
| |
| “No, of course not!”<br>
| |
| “SHOWS WHAT A GOOD DISGUISE IT IS.”<br>}}
| |
| | |
| Walk proudly away. Your work is done. Of course it won’t make a blind bit of difference, but you may feel better.
| |
| | |
| Such individuals are uniquely susceptible to [[Schwarzschild radii]].
| |
| | |
| All lawyers are philosophers; good lawyers are just bad ones. <ref>(Bad lawyers are worse, and they have nothing on philosophers, who are terrible lawyers. The pits.)</ref>
| |
| | |
| {{dramatis personae}}
| |
| {{C2|latin|metaphor}}
| |
| {{ref}}
| |