Mediocre lawyer: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Redirected page to Legal eagle
Tags: New redirect Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
One trained in the law, genus ''[[causidicus mediocris]]'', whose principle fear is being blind-sided by the very language — English — in which {{sex|she}} must ply her trade. Such individuals are uniquely susceptible to [[Schwarzschild radii]]. When you press her why she must so persistently desecrate her calling, she will tell you this:
#redirect[[legal eagle]]
 
“My drafting may be convoluted, but it is effective: It must be, for we haven’t had any [[litigation]] on it.”
 
If you have the patience, this is the time to wheel out your pre-prepared joke:
 
{{box|
===The standard issue drafting joke===
 
“Did you know”, you say, “that, for a disguise, [[elephant]]s paint the soles of their feet yellow, and hide upside-down in custard?” <br>
“Why, that’s preposterous!”<br>
“Aha! but have you ever ''seen'' an [[elephant]] hiding upside-down in custard?”<br>
“No, of course not!”<br>
“SHOWS WHAT A GOOD DISGUISE IT IS.”<br>}}
 
Walk proudly away. Your work is done. Of course it won’t make a blind bit of difference, but you may feel better.
 
All lawyers are philosophers; good lawyers are just bad ones. Bad lawyers are worse. They have nothing on philosophers, though, who are terrible lawyers. The pits.
 
{{dramatis personae}}
{{C2|latin|metaphor}}
{{ref}}

Latest revision as of 13:15, 29 November 2019

Redirect to: