Elephants and turtles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
For here is the problem, [[lazengem]]: ''Every'' good dictionary is circular. Not just the Hindu one. | For here is the problem, [[lazengem]]: ''Every'' good dictionary is circular. Not just the Hindu one. | ||
{{draft}} | {{draft}} | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*[[precedent]] | *[[precedent]] | ||
*[[Elephant]] | |||
*[[law]] | *[[law]] | ||
*[[policy]] | *[[policy]] | ||
*{{tag|metaphysics}} | *{{tag|metaphysics}} | ||
Revision as of 16:08, 7 January 2020
A Hindu myth with a pretty obvious logical flaw that atheists like to think neatly demolishes the intellectual pretensions of organized religion — which it does — while neatly demolishing the intellectual pretensions of secularists, lawyers, scientists and atheists at the same time.
For here is the problem, lazengem: Every good dictionary is circular. Not just the Hindu one.